US worker output fell in Q1 by most in a year
FILE - In this Jan. 12, 2012, file photo, workers assemble freightliner trucks at a plant in Cleveland, N.C. U.S. workers productivity fell during the first three months of the year, the Labor Department said Thursday, May 3. The drop in productivity could signal that companies can't squeeze more output from their existing workers and must hire to meet rising demand. (AP Photo/Chuck Burton, File)
WASHINGTON - U.S. worker productivity fell from January through March by the most in a year. Stronger hiring at the start of the year was partly responsible for the drop.
While worker output rose, the number of hours worked increased by an even larger amount. That lowered productivity in the first quarter at an annual rate of 0.5 per cent, the Labor Department said Thursday.
Productivity is the amount of output per hour of work. It fell after increasing at an annual rate of 1.2 per cent in the October-December quarter.
The decline after lacklustre output last year could be a positive sign for jobseekers. It could signal that companies are struggling to squeeze more from their work forces and must hire to meet rising demand.
"One reason that employment increased at a faster pace in the first quarter is that firms are finding it harder to improve the efficiency of their existing work forces," said Paul Ashworth, chief U.S. economist at Capital Economics.
The bad news for workers — and good news for companies — is that hourly compensation increased just 1.5 per cent, Ashworth noted. That was a key reason labour costs rose at a rate of just 2 per cent in the first quarter, slightly slower than the 2.7 per cent increase in the fourth quarter.
Lower labour costs should eventually help push inflation below the Federal Reserve's target rate of 2 per cent, Ashworth noted. That would leave the Fed more room to stick with its plan to keep interest rates near zero at least through 2014.
Productivity grew last year at the slowest pace in nearly a quarter century after rising sharply in 2010. The main reason productivity soared in 2010 was that it followed the worst recession in decades, when employers laid off millions of workers.
Economists said the trend is typical during and after a recession. Companies tend to shed workers in the face of falling demand and increase output from a smaller work force.
Once the economy starts to grow, demand rises and companies eventually reach a saturation point. Many employers must add more workers, if they want to grow.
It was the first drop since a 0.3 per cent fall in the April-June quarter of last year and was the largest since a 1 per cent drop at the start of 2011.
Economists expect productivity growth will remain weak this year. Economists at JPMorgan are forecasting productivity will rise 0.7 per cent this year as companies add more workers.
Hiring slowed in March after a strong start this year. The economy added just 120,000 workers — half the monthly average from December through January.
The government will report on April job growth Friday. Economists expect employers added 163,000 last month, according to a survey by FactSet. The unemployment rate is expected to stay unchanged at 8.2 per cent.
Rising labour costs can signal inflation pressures. But economists have not expressed worries about the recent higher trend for unit labour costs. With so many people out of work and looking for jobs, there is little chance that wage pressures will get out of hand, they note.
That return to more normal hiring patterns is good for the economy because it reduces unemployment and provides consumers with more spending power. Consumer spending accounts for 70 per cent of economic growth.
MSN.ca Money's editorial goal is to provide a forum for personal finance and investment ideas. Our articles, columns, message board posts and other features should not be construed as investment advice, nor does their appearance imply an endorsement by Microsoft of any specific security or trading strategy. An investor's best course of action must be based on individual circumstances.
Is it important to own a house?
Thanks for being one of the first people to vote. Results will be available soon. Check for results
- 77 %1. Yes, owning a home is an investment that will pay off.
- 2. No, I'd rather save my money and rent.
- 3. No, I can't afford to buy a home.
- 4. I don't know.