UK bank shares fall after JPMorgan loss disclosed
Automobiles pass a JP Morgan Chase building Thursday, May 10, 2012, in New York. JPMorgan Chase, the largest bank in the United States, said Thursday that it lost $2 billion in the past six weeks in a trading portfolio designed to hedge against risks the company takes with its own money. The company's stock plunged almost 7 percent in after-hours trading after the loss was announced. Other bank stocks, including Citigroup and Bank of America, suffered heavy losses as well. (AP Photo/Frank Franklin II)
LONDON - Shares in major British banks fell Friday in the first day of trading after JPMorgan Chase revealed a surprise loss of $2 billion in six weeks in trading on derivatives by its London operation.
Barclays, which has a large investment banking arm, was the biggest loser, shedding 2.5 per cent at midday. Royal Bank of Scotland fell 1.6 per cent, Lloyds Banking Group 1.5 per cent and HSBC 1.3 per cent.
Ian Gordon, analyst at Investec Securities, said the share movements may be based on a fear that Morgan's difficulty will lead to tougher regulations on banking.
"Based on the limited information available, it's attributed to egregious error within JPMorgan, so there is no reason to read across that specific loss to any other bank," Gordon said.
Jordan Lambert, a trader at Spreadex in London, said the market reaction was understandable.
"When such shocks occur, it is wise to err on the side of caution and consider whether it is a possible tip of the iceberg scenario, especially when one contemplates the interconnectedness of the banking system," he said.
JPMorgan Chase, the largest bank in the United States, said it lost $2 billion in the past six weeks in a trading portfolio designed to hedge against risks the company takes with its own money.
"The portfolio has proved to be riskier, more volatile and less effective as an economic hedge than we thought," CEO Jamie Dimon told reporters. "There were many errors, sloppiness and bad judgment."
The Wall Street Journal reported that JPMorgan was in touch with Britain's financial regulator, the Financial Services Authority, about the trading loss, but neither the company nor the regulator would comment.
The Journal and Bloomberg News reported in April that other investors were reacting to massive positions taken by a London trader identified as Bruno Michel Iksil, who worked in the Morgan's risk management arm, the Chief Investment Office.
At the time, Dimon dismissed concerns as "a complete tempest in a teapot."
According to the register of the Financial Services Authority, Iksil joined JPMorgan Chase and J.P. Morgan Europe Ltd. on Nov. 1, 2007.
Deutsche Bank, Credit Suisse, Goldman Sachs and Bank of America are among more than 240 foreign banks which have offices in London, Europe's biggest financial centre.
Swiss bank UBS last year reported losing $2 billion through unauthorized trades allegedly made by a junior employee in London.
London accounts for 46 per cent of the over-the-counter derivatives market, 70 per cent of eurobond turnover and 19 per cent of global hedge fund assets, according to the City of London, which governs the financial district.
The banking crisis which began in 2008 has caused British authorities to reconsider the previous emphasis on "light touch" regulation. On Wednesday, the government announced that it would be legislating new regulations in the current session of Parliament, including forcing banks to insulate their retail operations from riskier investment banking.
MSN.ca Money's editorial goal is to provide a forum for personal finance and investment ideas. Our articles, columns, message board posts and other features should not be construed as investment advice, nor does their appearance imply an endorsement by Microsoft of any specific security or trading strategy. An investor's best course of action must be based on individual circumstances.
Should new wireless companies Mobilicity, Wind Mobile and Public Mobile be allowed to fail?
Thanks for being one of the first people to vote. Results will be available soon. Check for results
- Yes, the market will decide if they are competitive enough to survive.
- No, the playing field in the wireless market is not level. The government should help these companies.
- I don't know.